The rational rule for buyers says that buyers and sellers should only be concerned with the monetary value of the property. That means the actual condition of the property, its location, amenities, etc. The rational rule for sellers says that, while a buyer should evaluate the market, the seller should not. We should only concern ourselves with the property’s value, because that’s what’s most important.
Well, we are getting in an argument with the seller, which is understandable. In this day and age where the real estate market is in the crapper, the rational rule says you should only be concerned with the monetary value of the property, especially if it is a short sale. Buyers are going to be looking for the best deal they can get and they should be very picky about what they look at.
I would say the same thing, but when you buy something, you usually have a specific purpose in mind. The reason why you are buying this house is because you have a friend in it, so you know you have somewhere nice to live. If you are buying a house, you must be very careful about the value of the house to you, and the value of the home to the home buyer.
What I mean is that a short sale is more than just a short sale. It is also a mortgage. If you are a buyer, you must always examine the mortgage to determine if you can afford the house. If you are a buyer that is selling to someone else, you must be very careful in your research with the home’s value to the person who is selling the home.
When I was first thinking about buying my first house, the real estate agent told me that the realtor in my area was charging $10 to $15 per square foot for a house with four bedrooms. In my neighborhood, a house with three bedrooms and two baths would be worth around $60,000. Now, obviously a $30,000 house is not worth that much, but I didn’t think $30,000 house was a good place to live. The realtor was right.
For your first home, I would say that the realtor was right. The realtor is trying to get a good price for a house, but most people would rather they get a house for their kids or family than for a big house. But the key difference is that a house with four bedrooms and two baths is NOT worth that much. A house with three bedrooms would be the same thing.
For your second home, you are correct. A house with three bedrooms and two baths is NOT a good place to live. There is a difference between a house that has three bedrooms and two baths and a house that has three bedrooms and one bath. I dont know if anyone knows what the difference is, but I would say that the second one sounds better than the first.
The difference between a two-bedroom house and a one-bedroom house is that a house with two bedrooms and two baths will have more people than a house with three bedrooms and two baths, which has the same number of people. However, a house with three bedrooms and two baths will have more people than a house with three bedrooms and one bath, which has the same number of people.
It’s a common mistake to think that because a family with three bedrooms and two baths has four people who need to be in the house at any given time, that will also mean four people who have to be in the house at any given moment. In reality, a house that has three bedrooms and two baths is actually more likely to have four people needing to be at home when a family with three bedrooms and two baths has just four people.
So why is that? A third bedroom and bath are a great way to provide space for more sleeping or entertaining. It’s also a great way to allow people who need extra bedroom space to use the extra room. The house example above is a great way to show how a house with three bedrooms and one bath can actually be more likely to have four people needing to be at home.